In the vein of my last post What is a musician supposed to look like?, I’ll tell you here an other story, but this time the story didn’t take place in a neutral environment but in a dressing room after a recital of mine, a long time ago (actually, at the very beginning of my career). I remember until today this old man who came to tell me how much he loved my playing, but he pursued with a very very strange question : “Are you going to move more when playing? You should show your passion by moving much more than you do, you know, like these pianists I see on TV.” This question might seem insignificant but it’s definitely not. The old man’s observation has often been sounding in my ears while thinking about my playing, and made me think a lot about my “style” as a pianist and what was really important while performing. It was a kind of butterfly effect: an insignificant question led to a complete theory about the kind of pianist I want to be.

Interpreter: word which can, by extension, replace the word musician. Yet the two words have a totally different connotation: if the latter clearly evokes music and the inspired craftsman created in and by popular imagination, first emphasizes another facet of the same man: here is suggested the intellectual work, in other words the analysis and long road towards understanding a work.

These days, at the height of a world financial crisis, everything seems to be all about one thing: stock exchange variations or bank crashes. For a long time already, the force and quality of things are measured in economic values. Even art, though previous to speculation…

Often I see my collegues being surprised when we pronounce certain words or names. Adorno, Badiou, Deleuze, names that should not appear in the middle of a musical discussion. However philosophy has its role in music, and has strongly influenced History of musical creation.